The court told the England team to oppose Real City or not.

The World Sports Arbitration Court (CAS) states that many Premier League teams objected to Manchester City in case they would appeal to play in the Champions League during the pending appeal. Along with explaining the reason for canceling the ban "Blue Sailboat" also

The World Arbitration Court (CAS) revealed that Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham Hotspur, Leicester City, Wolves Hampton Wanderers, Burnley and Newcastle United, 9 clubs in the English Premier League, try to ask them not to approve Manchester City to ask to suspend a ban on European games temporarily. If the "blue sailboat" submits a request like that As has been a real rumor

In February, Manchester City was banned from the European Football Federation (UEFA) banning European programs such as the Champions League for two seasons and a fine of 30 million euros (about 1,050 million baht) from Uefa's view of the "blue sailboat" forged numbers in accounts to avoid financial regulation (Lex Fair Play), especially the money issues from sponsorship contracts such as Ezez Lat and Eti. Hud Airlines, which the evidence used by UEFA to decide the case is email. That was brought out to unfold

However, Manchester City refused to appeal against NCAA until July, the CSA has canceled the ban on European games. Along with reducing a fine of 10 million euros (about 350 million baht)

While waiting for the decision to appeal, there are also rumors that Manchester City will ask CAs to help suspend the ban during the appeal. So they can play in the Champions League while awaiting a decision Because at that time it was believed that it might take a long time to finish judging It has led to reports that many teams in England have asked the CSA to not approve if Manchester City really does. The report states that the majority of the opposing team is the team in the top row of the table. And it makes the manager of Josep Guardiola Manchester City so dissatisfied until the interview with the various irony. 

Until the most recent, the SAS has revealed that there is a team that really does that, but adding that Manchester City has never applied to suspend a ban on European games before. And confident that their appeal will be settled quickly Including believing that the appeal will be successful

The CAAS has just released the full details of the verdict on Tuesday, July 28, in which some statements state that "On 9 March 2020, 9 clubs from the Premier League filed an objection to the MCC. The FC (abbreviated from Manchester City Football Club) may ask them to still play during the appeal process. "

Regarding the verdict of the case, CA said that Manchester City had told them that there were 5.5 million emails stolen, which UEFA used 6 emails in the trial. Accept that those emails can be evidence of the case But it can't be proven that Man City has forged an account as allegedly because Ezez Lat has paid Manchester City for just one moment. Which clearly matches UEFA's rules, while Etihad Airlines has also paid Manchester City for just one moment too, causing CAS to finally cancel the European ban.Still, the CAS also blamed Manchester City for not fully participating in UEFA's investigation before appealing. And that leads to they still adjust Manchester City money by only reducing the amount. อ่านต่อได้ที่  แทงบอลออนไลน์  UFABETที่ดีที่สุด